Princeton abandons early admission

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/19/education/19admit.html

At the meeting in New York, the presidents said they spelled out their concerns over families’ paying of thousands of dollars for private college counselors, obstacles for low-income applicants and tactics some colleges use to rise in the U.S. News & World Report rankings. They spoke of efforts to drive up a college’s number of applications, so it can turn away a greater proportion of students and appear more selective, or to distribute merit aid to lure students who are top notch but not financially needy.

What I bolded sounds like a self-perpetuating tactic. But seriously, I don’t see what’s wrong with the concept of early admission. If it works, you get a stress-free Senior year, and if it does not, you learn that you don’t fit the requirements for that type of college. Good thing Stanford and Caltech aren’t doing that :P

There are 80 or so Californians admitted to Caltech as freshmen each year. That’s a bit scary.

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.